Sometimes, when you read an article in the press (A48 bridge incident Review w/e Aug 9 15) you get the impression that it does not paint the full picture and, in this case, a full angle is left unexplored, with knee-jerk reaction quotes replacing actual relevant questions that need to be asked.

I am of the opinion there is little wrong with the A48 particularly if speed limits, recognition of adequate signage, and, let’s be honest, basic common sense is adhered to.

Looking at the recent situation and talking to experienced local HGV drivers, who, it must be said are concerned that incidents like the one at Broadoak are detrimental to the reputation of their industry, I believe that the questions that need answers are:

1, Why supposedly professional drivers are failing to interpret signage, oblivious to the actual bridges and oblivious to the actual load they are carrying some six foot behind where they are seated?

2, Are they adequately versed in the mechanics of the vehicles they are actually driving? I’m told that audible sat-nav warnings (if set correctly) would have sounded on approach to the bridge. I’m also told that the type of vehicle involved also has an air mechanism that allows a slight reduction in height if required, and from looking at the photograph something was required!

3, Can we be sure that we must be sure around vehicles that pose such potential risks on our roads, that individual HGV drivers on our roads have a clear and precise understanding of the English language that allows them at least the opportunity to read the adequate signage.

4, Are the operators themselves fully confident in the ability of the person they are sending out on the roads?

Cllr Alan Preest, UKIP Lydney