LAST week's Review letters page,  carried yet more  input from UKIP representatives. 

The previous week, a letter from Cllr Hogan (Lab), in which he criticised Cllr Preest (UKIP), was published.

Why it was considered necessary to publish  a letter, from  each of  UKIP's three  councillors  in response to Cllr Hogan  is unclear if not a trifle biased.

UKIP's policies are put forward in the Review,  by  councillors Preest, Leppington and Guyton with alarming regularity.

Their unwillingness to accept any sort of criticism is only too apparent but should they be allowed to gang-up on and bully  someone in this manner ?

Some of your readers have already written to  complain that the  letters page,  is beginning to look like a UKIP newsletter. Last week's edition did nothing to discourage this thinking.

– P. Young, Chepstow.

Editor's note: We do not operate a quota system. Anybody, regardless of political affiliation, is free to avail themselves of the letters page. UKIP and its policies are clearly of great interest to a large number of people who write to the Review so, unsurprisingly, the letters page reflects this. If three Labour, Conservative or Independent councillors wrote criticising another party, the letters would be treated in exactly the same manner.