WORDS from Mr Jim Paice MP, Minister of State for
Agriculture and Food, quote: "We envisage a managed
programme of reform to further develop a competitive,
thriving and resilient forestry sector that includes many
sustainably managed woods operating as parts of viable
land-based businesses" unquote.
Yet we already have a thriving and resilient forestry
sector on Crown and Common Land managed by the
Forestry Commission on behalf of Mr Paice and the
nation. It meets most of the Paice objectives and exceeds
them in a number of ways.
If the Minister feels that it is failing in certain ways
then surely it is for his department to make a better job of
managing this sphere?
Providing safe access to the wild, free forests of
England in public ownership, it makes a valuable
contribution to tourism. And, in tandem it provides a vital
resource for folk to enjoy exercise, relaxation and such
simple pleasure.
The Commission fills an important role in education
by welcoming school and student parties, so that they
may be aware of the true value and importance of the
nation's woodland heritage. It partly self-funds by timber
production.
The Paice proposals amount ot this; selling into
private ownership the 18 per cent of England's public-
owned forests, putting them beyond reach of day to day
government influence; much as the 82 per cent currently
privately owned sector stands.
Many of the Minister's stated policy goals will thus
become irrelevant. The Commission's role is to be
reduced to little more than a paper shuffling bureaucracy,
neatly writing off the most valuable tool he has to apply
long term national strategies in this area.
At a stroke, the Minister is stifling the best hope we
have of maintaining the bio-diversity of our woodlands
and harnessing the carbon absorptive nature of trees to
confront global warming.
Abroad we exhort poorer nations to make a top
priority of using their forest resources to combat climate
change. At home we make exploitation for profit our top
priority!
– Darrell Lawrence, Lancaster Drive, Lydney.





Comments
This article has no comments yet. Be the first to leave a comment.